Ultra-Processed Food Consumption, Sleep Patterns, and Cardiometabolic Risk Among Young Adults: A Harmonized Comparative Framework for the United Kingdom and Ghana
Abstract
Background: The joint distribution of ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption, sleep behaviour and cardiometabolic risk is poorly characterised in comparable young-adult samples across the United Kingdom and Ghana.
Objective: To develop a harmonised cross-country epidemiological protocol and a technically explicit analytical strategy for estimating nonlinear exposure–outcome associations, between-setting heterogeneity and measurement uncertainty.
Methods: The proposed cross-sectional field design targets adults aged 18–35 years and integrates repeated NOVA-coded dietary recall, sleep timing and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index assessment, anthropometry, blood pressure and glycaemic measurements. An existing synthetic dataset of 2,400 records, divided evenly between country-labelled scenarios, is retained strictly to demonstrate the analysis workflow. The revised framework introduces latent usual-intake models, spline-based and hierarchical generalised models, flexible sleep interaction structures, multiple imputation, measurement invariance checks and quantitative bias analysis. Results: Six existing simulation figures illustrate predetermined scenario differences and correlations; none constitute observed UK or Ghana estimates. The expanded models are specified for future application but have not been empirically fitted to participant data.
Conclusions: A harmonised, pre-registered design can test whether UPF–cardiometabolic associations vary across sleep profiles and food environments. Representative recruitment, ethics approvals and independent model validation are prerequisites for population claims.
How to Cite This Article
Rosetta Quaicoe (2026). Ultra-Processed Food Consumption, Sleep Patterns, and Cardiometabolic Risk Among Young Adults: A Harmonized Comparative Framework for the United Kingdom and Ghana . International Journal of Biological and Biomedical Research (IJBBR), 2(6), 11-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54660/IJBBR.2026.2.6.11-20